Post by maxxplay on Sept 11, 2008 9:48:25 GMT -5
Hello fine people I can use some of your input here.
I'm an older cat (56) and played all the now vintage stuff when it was new or just used gear...lol
I am very into the old modded Marshall sound and Splawn has seemed to nail it. I have an older QR here (no dedicated clean eq) that I can possibly buy from a friend. ...and I was also looking at the Comp 50. I'm into "simple" and can get more then the clean I need with the vol right on my guitar, so the dedicated clean is not an issue for me. I may not even need the clean channel on this older QR here.
Right now (most times) I am playing through a Komet 60, a truly great amp but, it must be cranked to get "the" sound (non-master)
and even through a 2x12 (not the usual 4x12) it is really loud.
I was told it puts out 50 watts at 1/4 volume and is cranking in the area of 80-90 watts when up (believe it). This works fine in some of the venues I play. The situation I run into is smaller venues. I highly dislike attenuators and what they do to the interaction of the power section and the speakers, and distortion pedals just don't really cut it for me.
Now as loud as the QR 100 here is, the master allows me to get it into a very reasonable territory for my situations.
Not looking for a bedroom amp, Live-shows-amp is what I need.
So there you have it. Based on that, your opinions, QR or Comp?
Also, on reliability how do the amps compare?
how is Splawn period on that. (the QR is here for repairs)
Hey thanx for your time!
take care...AnT
I'm an older cat (56) and played all the now vintage stuff when it was new or just used gear...lol
I am very into the old modded Marshall sound and Splawn has seemed to nail it. I have an older QR here (no dedicated clean eq) that I can possibly buy from a friend. ...and I was also looking at the Comp 50. I'm into "simple" and can get more then the clean I need with the vol right on my guitar, so the dedicated clean is not an issue for me. I may not even need the clean channel on this older QR here.
Right now (most times) I am playing through a Komet 60, a truly great amp but, it must be cranked to get "the" sound (non-master)
and even through a 2x12 (not the usual 4x12) it is really loud.
I was told it puts out 50 watts at 1/4 volume and is cranking in the area of 80-90 watts when up (believe it). This works fine in some of the venues I play. The situation I run into is smaller venues. I highly dislike attenuators and what they do to the interaction of the power section and the speakers, and distortion pedals just don't really cut it for me.
Now as loud as the QR 100 here is, the master allows me to get it into a very reasonable territory for my situations.
Not looking for a bedroom amp, Live-shows-amp is what I need.
So there you have it. Based on that, your opinions, QR or Comp?
Also, on reliability how do the amps compare?
how is Splawn period on that. (the QR is here for repairs)
Hey thanx for your time!
take care...AnT