|
|
Post by Patrick on Sept 2, 2005 8:44:39 GMT -5
Hello All,
I tend to be more of a rack player, y'know pre-amps and power amps, and I noticed that Scott doesn't make any pre-amp'ed versions of his gear. I'm curious if we could generate enough interest to encourage Mr. Splawn to seriously consider the idea? Your input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Manoopee
|
|
|
|
Post by VomHalen on Sept 2, 2005 8:46:07 GMT -5
hi there,
although it'd be a cool option, i like the way it is now ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Patrick on Sept 2, 2005 8:47:30 GMT -5
I noticed when I submitted this poll my vote was cast for the "nah" option. That is not correct as I'm in favor of the idea. This response is to correctly place my vote.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Post by VomHalen on Sept 2, 2005 8:57:21 GMT -5
no, my vote was submitted for the nah option..i think we're the only 2 that voted...
|
|
|
|
Post by VomHalen on Sept 2, 2005 8:59:28 GMT -5
another issue with this is, doesn't the tone change depending on what power amp you would use?...that would affect your tone
|
|
|
|
Post by shreder75 on Sept 2, 2005 9:07:30 GMT -5
another issue with this is, doesn't the tone change depending on what power amp you would use?...that would affect your tone you are indeed correct, my friend =) that's one reason why people do the whole rack thing..you can mix and match power/pre sections to get something totally unique... |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick on Sept 2, 2005 9:58:18 GMT -5
another issue with this is, doesn't the tone change depending on what power amp you would use?...that would affect your tone I think it would, but I don't think that would necessarily be a bad thing. Right?  |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick on Sept 2, 2005 10:00:02 GMT -5
no, my vote was submitted for the nah option..i think we're the only 2 that voted... hehe. This darn technology gets me everytime! |
|
|
|
Post by VomHalen on Sept 2, 2005 10:06:51 GMT -5
another issue with this is, doesn't the tone change depending on what power amp you would use?...that would affect your tone I think it would, but I don't think that would necessarily be a bad thing. Right? no not really but then you'd be working against what a splawn really sounds like |
|
|
|
Post by scottdh on Sept 2, 2005 17:42:02 GMT -5
I like the idea - I think it would open the Splawn world up to many players who prefer a modular rig and/or other power sources.
|
|
|
|
Post by VomHalen on Sept 2, 2005 19:06:34 GMT -5
but if you're getting a splawn for the sound of a splawn then you're working against that with a rack unit
|
|
|
|
Post by northern1 on Sept 3, 2005 18:13:33 GMT -5
IMHO, Lets leave the rack stuff to the other companies and keep the Splawn amps as they are perfect!! Less is more and this = better quality.  |
|
|
|
Post by Dirrty Craig on Sept 4, 2005 0:21:23 GMT -5
I couldn't do it. too much crap in the signal chain. chords going from amp to pre-amp,,,, yuck.
Plus I think the characters of a really good amp is the relationship between the preamp and poweramp section and how they work together to acheive a certain tone.
|
|
|
|
Post by VomHalen on Sept 4, 2005 4:11:30 GMT -5
I couldn't do it. too much crap in the signal chain. chords going from amp to pre-amp,,,, yuck. Plus I think the characters of a really good amp is the relationship between the preamp and poweramp section and how they work together to acheive a certain tone. this is what i'm talking about...once you start changing the power amp section...do you really have a quick rod anymore? |
|
